I took an airport shuttle service home once I got back to California. Sitting next to me was an old man who was quite talkative (and a little odd). We talked a bit about the college I went to, then the driver asked him where he was from. He said Pennsylvania, and made reference to the Penn State sex abuse scandal. For those living under a rock, the former assistant coach for the school's football team was found to have sexually assaulted or molested a number of underage boys, and various school officials (possibly including the head coach and the school president) helped cover it up. So, a really messed up situation, and at the center of it a really messed up individual. Anyways, while discussing the scandal with the driver, the old man said something along the following lines about his interpretation of how the school was reacting to the scandal: "Penn State is sending a message out: No pedophiles or queers."
My mouth nearly dropped open when he lumped gay people with pedophiles (not to mention his use of the word "queer" . . . I'm not a fan of that word, even when used in a less derogatory fashion or by gay people themselves). Suddenly this nice, if slightly strange old man had taken a turn and become an intolerant, ignorant and bigoted individual. This was the first time in recent memory that I'd witnessed such blatant homophobia, and he had done it so casually. Now, I know this guy is a product of his generation. I know that his way of thinking is declining. But it still makes me sad . . . and angry.
I guess you could say this entry is a thematic cousin to the last entry, because the core problem here is closed-mindedness. It irks me how so many people come to definitive conclusions about things that they know very little about, refuse to consider things from other points of view, and then become so set in their opinions that they are very hard, if not impossible to change. This one tendency lies at the root of so much human suffering, whether you're talking about a family squabble at the dinner table or wide-scale persecution of a religious minority.
I try very hard to keep an open-mind. I don't know if it's my personality, my upbringing, my scientific background, or a combination (probably most likely), but I always prefer to gather evidence and consider multiple sides before I reach a conclusion. Not to sound conceited, but I feel like humanity would be a lot better off if more people were like this.
Of course, it does have to be a balancing act. This blog is a good example as to why you eventually have to make up your mind. Evidence-gathering can't go on forever. One of my favorite quotes, by Carl Sagan: "It pays to keep an open mind, but not so open your brains fall out." We all need beliefs to get by in life because there are few things that we can really be 100% certain about. Life is all about working with limited evidence. Perhaps the middle ground is to make decisions and form opinions, but always be open to the possibility that you could be wrong. That's why I've long called myself an agnostic rather than an atheist. If I was given credible evidence in God's existence, I would certainly change my mind (lately I'm not sure whether this really bars me from being considered an atheist, but that's a topic for another post).
Anyways, feel free to sound off. Is there such a thing as being too open-minded? Would the world be a better place if everyone were a scientist (as a world-view, not as an occupation)? Any run-ins with homophobic idiots and their ridiculous generalizations?